mouse fabp4 elisa kit (Elabscience Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Mouse Fabp4 Elisa Kit, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse fabp4 elisa kit/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "FABP4 secreted by M1-polarized macrophages promotes synovitis and angiogenesis to exacerbate rheumatoid arthritis"
Article Title: FABP4 secreted by M1-polarized macrophages promotes synovitis and angiogenesis to exacerbate rheumatoid arthritis
Journal: Bone Research
doi: 10.1038/s41413-022-00211-2
Figure Legend Snippet: The expression of FABP4 in the RA mouse model, BMDMs and RA patients. a , b FABP4 concentrations in the synovial fluid ( a ) and serum ( b ) of controls and RA patients ( n = 8 per group) were assessed by ELISA. C Representative images and quantification of HE staining and FABP4 immunohistochemical staining in the synovium of control and C57BL/6 J mice at 4 and 8 weeks after AIA modeling ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 50 μm, 100 μm and 200 μm. d Representative images and quantitative analysis of coimmunostaining of FABP4 with F4/80 or NOS2 in the synovium of control and C57BL/6 J mice at 4 and 8 weeks after AIA modeling ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 12.5 μm. e Representative images and quantification of safranin O and fast green staining and FABP4 immunohistochemical staining in knee cartilage from controls and C57BL/6 J mice at 4 and 8 weeks after AIA modeling ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 50 μm and 100 μm. f Western blot showing FABP4 and NOS2 in BMDMs stimulated with 50, 200, or 500 ng·mL −1 LPS for 12 h or 24 h. g Quantitative PCR analysis of NOS2, Arg-1, and FABP4 mRNA expression in BMDMs ( n = 3 per group). h FABP4 concentrations in the supernatant of BMDMs stimulated with 50, 200, or 500 ng·mL −1 LPS for 12 h or 24 h ( n = 3 per group) were assessed by ELISA. Student’s t -test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01; ns, no significance. The data are shown as the mean ± SEM
Techniques Used: Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Staining, Immunohistochemical staining, Control, Western Blot, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: The effect of FABP4 and M1-polarized macrophage supernatant on HUVECs, FLSs, and chondrocytes in vitro. a , b Tube formation assay and quantification of HUVECs cultured with vehicle (C), rhFABP4 (P), rhFABP4 + BMS309403 (PB), M1-polarized macrophage supernatant (S), or M1-polarized macrophage supernatant+BMS309403 (SB) ( n = 3 per group). Scale bar: 100 µm. c Immunoblot analysis of FABP4 and VEGFα in HUVECs cultured with C, P, PB, S, or SB for 24 h. d , g Representative images and quantification of BrdU (green) immunofluorescence ( d ) and Transwell assays ( g ) in HUVECs and FLSs treated with C, P, PB, S, or SB for 24 h ( n = 3 per group). Scale bar: 25 µm, 100 µm. e , f Immunoblot analysis of ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2, P65, and p-P65 in HUVECs ( e ) and FLSs ( f ) treated with C, P, PB, S, or SB for 1 h. h Toluidine blue staining of ATDC5 cells treated with C, P, PB, S, or SB for 24 h ( n = 3 per group). i Immunoblot analysis of FABP4, MMP13, Sox9, and Col2a1 in primary chondrocytes treated with C, P, PB, S, or SB for 24 h. j Immunoblot analysis of P65 and p-P65 in primary chondrocytes treated with C, P, PB, S, or SB for 1 h. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01; # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 compared to the control. The data are shown as the mean ± SEM
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Tube Formation Assay, Cell Culture, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Comparison, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Recombinant FABP4 exacerbates the development of RA in C57BL/6 J mice. a Representative images and quantitative analysis of FABP4 were assessed by immunohistochemical staining and coimmunostaining of FABP4 with F4/80 or NOS2 in the synovium of control and RA mice treated with vehicle or rmFABP4 for 4 and 8 weeks ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 12.5 µm and 100 µm. b – i Representative images and quantification of Vimentin and MMP3 coimmunostaining ( b , f ), CD31 and EMCN coimmunostaining ( c , g ), Col2a1 immunofluorescence staining ( d , h ), and MMP13 immunohistochemical staining ( e , i ) in the knee joints of control and RA mice treated with vehicle or rmFABP4 for 4 and 8 weeks ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 12.5 µm, 25 µm, and 100 µm. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ** P < 0.01. The data are shown as the mean ± SEM
Techniques Used: Recombinant, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Control, Immunofluorescence, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Activation of the mTORC1 pathway enhances the secretion of FABP4 by M1-polarized macrophages to exacerbate RA progression. a , b Representative images and quantification of F4/80 and pS6 coimmunostaining in the mouse ( n = 10 per group) ( a ) and human synovium ( n = 16 per group) ( b ) of the control and RA groups. Scale bar: 12.5 µm. c Western blot showing S6 and pS6 in human synovial tissue. d Western blot showing FABP4, NOS2, S6 and pS6 in BMDMs treated with LPS or rapamycin. e Representative immunofluorescence staining images and quantitative analysis of FABP4 in BMDMs stimulated with LPS or rapamycin ( n = 3 per group). Scale bar: 100 µm. f Western blot showing FABP4, NOS2, S6 and pS6 in BMDMs treated with MHY1485 or rapamycin. g Representative immunofluorescence staining images and quantitative analysis of FABP4 in BMDMs treated with MHY1485 or rapamycin ( n = 3 per group). Scale bar: 100 µm. h Western blot showing FABP4, NOS2, S6 and pS6 in BMDMs from control and TSC1KO mice. i Representative images and quantification of F4/80 and pS6 coimmunostaining in the synovium of wild-type and TSC1KO mice at 4 and 8 weeks after AIA modeling ( n = 10 per group). Scale bar: 12.5 µm. j Representative images and quantification of FABP4 immunohistochemical staining and coimmunostaining of FABP4 with F4/80 or NOS2 in the synovium of control and TSC1KO mice at 4 and 8 weeks after AIA modeling ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 12.5 µm and 100 µm. f–j Representative images ( f ) and quantification of Vimentin and MMP3 coimmunostaining ( g ), CD31 and EMCN coimmunostaining ( h ), Col2a1 immunofluorescence staining ( i ), and MMP13 immunohistochemical staining ( j ) in the knee joints of controls and TSC1KO mice at 4 and 8 weeks after AIA modeling ( n = 10 per group). Scale bar: 12.5 µm, 25 µm, and 100 µm. Student’s t -test or one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ** P < 0.01. The data are shown as the mean ± SEM
Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Control, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Immunohistochemical staining, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Inhibition of the mTORC1 pathway reduces FABP4 secretion by M1-polarized macrophages to attenuate RA progression. a Representative images and quantification of F4/80 and pS6 coimmunostaining in the synovium of controls and Rheb1KO mice at 4 and 8 weeks after AIA modeling ( n = 10 per group). Scale bar: 12.5 µm. b – e Representative images ( b ) and quantitative analysis of FABP4 immunohistochemical staining ( c ) and coimmunostaining of FABP4 with F4/80 ( d ) or NOS2 ( e ) in the synovium of controls and Rheb1KO mice at 4 and 8 weeks after AIA modeling ( n = 10 per group). Scale bars: 12.5 µm and 100 µm. f – j Representative images ( f ) and quantitative analysis of Vimentin and MMP3 coimmunostaining ( g ), CD31 and EMCN coimmunostaining ( h ), Col2a1 immunofluorescence staining ( i ), and MMP13 immunohistochemical staining ( j ) in the knee joints of controls and Rheb1KO mice at 4 and 8 weeks after AIA modeling ( n = 10 per group). Scale bar: 12.5 µm, 25 µm, and 100 µm. Student’s t -test. ** P < 0.01. The data are shown as the mean ± SEM
Techniques Used: Inhibition, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Immunofluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: BMS309403 and anagliptin reduce FABP4 expression in murine synovial macrophages. a – c Representative images and quantification of FABP4 immunohistochemical staining and coimmunostaining of FABP4 with F4/80 or NOS2 in the synovium of TSC1KO mice treated with vehicle, BMS309403 or anagliptin for 4 and 8 weeks after AIA modeling ( n = 10 per group). Scale bar: 12.5 µm and 100 µm. d – f Representative images and quantification of FABP4 immunohistochemical staining and coimmunostaining of FABP4 and F4/80 or NOS2 in the synovium of RA mice treated with vehicle or BMS309403 for 4 and 8 weeks ( n = 10 per group). Scale bar: 12.5 µm and 100 µm. Student’s t -test or one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. The data are shown as the mean ± SEM
Techniques Used: Expressing, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Inhibiting FABP4 prevents RA development. a – d Representative images of Vimentin and MMP3 coimmunostaining ( a ), CD31 and EMCN coimmunostaining ( b ), Col2a1 immunofluorescence staining ( c ), and immunohistochemical staining of MMP13 ( D ) in the knee joints of TSC1KO mice treated with vehicle, BMS309403 or anagliptin for 4 and 8 weeks after AIA modeling. Scale bar: 12.5 µm, 25 µm, and 100 µm. e – h Representative images of Vimentin and MMP3 coimmunostaining ( e ), CD31 and EMCN coimmunostaining ( f ), Col2a1 immunofluorescence staining ( g ), and immunohistochemical staining of MMP13 ( h ) in the knee joints of RA mice treated with vehicle or BMS309403 for 4 and 8 weeks. Scale bar: 12.5 µm, 25 µm, and 100 µm. i – l Quantification of Vimentin-MMP3 ( i ), CD31-EMCN ( j ), Col2a1 ( k ), and MMP13 ( l ) in TSC1KO mice treated with vehicle, BMS309403, or anagliptin for 4 and 8 weeks after AIA surgery ( n = 10 per group). m – p Quantification of Vimentin-MMP3 ( m ), CD31-EMCN ( n ), Col2a1 ( o ), and MMP13 ( p ) in RA mice treated with vehicle or BMS309403 for 4 and 8 weeks ( n = 10 per group). Student’s t -test or one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test were used. ** P < 0.01. The data are shown as the mean ± SEM
Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Immunohistochemical staining, Comparison

